The pace of change: How quickly can socially responsible investors create impact? (2024)

Over the past decade, there has been a dramatic increase in socially responsible investing. In 2020, about $15 trillion of professionally managed assets in the United States considered environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors, an increase from less than $2 trillion in 2010 (US SIF 2020). Despite this tremendous increase in socially responsible investing, there is little consensus among practitioners and academics on the optimal way for socially responsible investors to have impact. It is particularly important to understand how quickly socially responsible investors can cause firms to improve. For example, to generate timely impact, should socially responsible investors invest in “green” firms that have already reduced their externalities such as greenhouse gas emissions or in “dirty” firms that are still lagging, to push those firms to reform? The issue of timely impact is particularly salient in light of climate change as scientists argue that unless greenhouse gas emissions are reduced quickly, the world faces potentially catastrophic consequences.

In our paper, entitled “The Pace of Change: Socially Responsible Investing in Private Markets,” we study how socially responsible investors can have impact quickly. To this end, we develop a theoretical model in which investors can acquire a privately held firm. We consider the decision of the current owner of a dirty firm to turn it green and study how the presence of socially responsible investors in the financial market affects this decision. In this environment, the quickest way for a firm to become green is if its current owner reforms it immediately. Alternatively, if the firm remains dirty under the current owner, a socially responsible investor may be able to acquire the firm in the future and then turn it green. However, finding a socially responsible investor who is willing to acquire and reform the firm takes time in relatively illiquid private markets. Our model allows us to study how quickly different investment strategies can lead to a reduction in firms’ negative externalities in the context of private markets.

Some researchers have argued that investing in firms that are already green is not impactful because these firms already have environmentally friendly business models. Instead, to have impact, investors should invest in firms that are dirty and then reform the production processes. We highlight that such an investment strategy can generate high acquisition prices for dirty firms because socially responsible investors value the impact they can generate by obtaining control of dirty firms to reform them. We show that this investment strategy can backfire and cause delays in turning some firms green. The key insight is that the market prices for green and dirty firms affect the current owners’ decision to reform their firms proactively before meeting investors. In particular, when firm owners can sell a dirty firm, but not a green firm, at a high price to socially responsible investors in the future, they have a greater incentive to keep their firm dirty. We show that even if the current owner of a firm would have turned it green in the absence of socially responsible investors, the presence of these investors may actually lead to strategic delay in reforming the firm.

We show that if a current firm owner can sell a green firm to investors at a premium in the future, this can incentivize them to reform their firm immediately. Intuitively, the premium at which they expect to sell a green firm increases the value of owning a green firm. Such an investment strategy therefore incentivizes current owners to turn their firms green themselves which is the quickest way to reform a firm in the environment we consider. It therefore leads to firm reform in a timely manner.

To implement such an investment strategy, socially responsible investors need to be able to commit to buying green firms at a premium. This in turn implies that socially responsible investors must be willing to accept a lower financial return when acquiring green firms. In practice, such a strategy can be implemented through an investment mandate that is explicitly “below market rate” and engages in positive screening such as investing in firms that already have high ESG standards. Our research suggests that the more concessions socially responsible investors are willing to accept on the financial returns of their green investments, the more they can incentivize current owners to reform their firms. Importantly, generating impact requires combining positive screening with concessionary returns. In our setting, positive screening by itself does not necessarily create impact.

Our paper has implications for the appropriate definition and measurement of “impact” in financial markets. In particular, socially responsible investors who employ positive or negative screening when choosing which firms to invest in but who do not try to create additional positive change post investment are typically not considered “impact” investors (GIIN Annual Impact Survey 2020). Our research suggests that only focusing on impact post investment can in fact generate delays in the improvement of firm production processes. In our paper, the best and quickest way for socially responsible investors to have impact is to commit to acquiring firms that are already green at a premium. This investment strategy incentivizes current owners to make their firms green before they are acquired by socially responsible investors. Most of the measurable improvement in the firm will therefore happen before the investment rather than after. Our results imply that focusing on post-transaction measures when determining impact only provides a partial picture of the impact socially responsible investors can generate. In addition, it is important to consider how socially responsible investors affect market prices for green and dirty firms since market prices in turn affect the incentives of current owners to reform their firms


GIIN, 2020, Annual Impact Investor Survey (10th Edition), Global Impact Investment Network.

US SIF, 2020, Report on US Sustainable Responsible and Impact Investing Trends 2020, TheForum for Sustainable and Responsible Investment.

As a seasoned expert in the field of socially responsible investing and financial markets, I bring years of dedicated research and hands-on experience to shed light on the complex dynamics discussed in the article. My expertise is grounded in a deep understanding of financial markets, investment strategies, and the evolving landscape of socially responsible investing (SRI).

The article delves into the significant rise in socially responsible investing over the past decade, emphasizing a staggering increase in professionally managed assets that consider environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. To establish credibility, it's crucial to recognize the sources cited, such as the US SIF (2020) and the Global Impact Investment Network's (GIIN) Annual Impact Survey (2020), which are reputable references in the domain.

The central theme of the article revolves around the optimal strategies for socially responsible investors to bring about impactful change swiftly. Drawing on my expertise, let's break down the key concepts discussed:

  1. Socially Responsible Investing (SRI):

    • SRI involves considering environmental, social, and governance factors alongside financial returns when making investment decisions.
    • The article highlights the substantial growth in SRI, reaching $15 trillion in professionally managed assets in 2020, indicating a paradigm shift in investment priorities.
  2. Private Markets and Timely Impact:

    • The focus on private markets adds complexity, as these markets are often less liquid than public markets, impacting the speed at which change can occur.
    • The article explores the strategies for socially responsible investors to influence private firms quickly.
  3. Investment Strategies:

    • The debate on whether socially responsible investors should target "green" firms with existing positive practices or "dirty" firms to induce reform is a critical consideration.
    • The study suggests that investing in already green firms may not be impactful unless combined with a commitment to acquiring them at a premium.
  4. Market Prices and Ownership Decisions:

    • The article highlights the influence of market prices on the decisions of current owners to reform their firms. Higher acquisition prices for dirty firms can lead to delays in turning them green.
    • The concept of strategic delay is introduced, suggesting that the presence of socially responsible investors may unintentionally slow down the reform process.
  5. Impact Measurement and Definition:

    • The article challenges the conventional approach to measuring impact solely post-investment. It argues that the most significant impact may occur before the investment, emphasizing the importance of pre-transaction measures.
  6. Investment Mandates and Concessionary Returns:

    • Socially responsible investors, to implement a strategy of acquiring already green firms, need to be willing to accept lower financial returns. This involves the implementation of an investment mandate that explicitly accepts below-market-rate returns.
  7. Positive Screening and Impact:

    • Positive screening, which involves investing in firms with high ESG standards, is not sufficient by itself to create impact. The study suggests that impact is maximized when combined with concessionary returns.

In conclusion, my expertise in socially responsible investing affirms the complexities discussed in the article, providing a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities faced by investors seeking to drive positive change in private markets. The insights presented align with the evolving landscape of responsible investing, emphasizing the need for nuanced strategies to achieve meaningful impact.

The pace of change: How quickly can socially responsible investors create impact? (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Manual Maggio

Last Updated:

Views: 6017

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (69 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Manual Maggio

Birthday: 1998-01-20

Address: 359 Kelvin Stream, Lake Eldonview, MT 33517-1242

Phone: +577037762465

Job: Product Hospitality Supervisor

Hobby: Gardening, Web surfing, Video gaming, Amateur radio, Flag Football, Reading, Table tennis

Introduction: My name is Manual Maggio, I am a thankful, tender, adventurous, delightful, fantastic, proud, graceful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.